Or, A brief jeremiad aimed at people who agree with Hobby Lobby and the various other companies jumping on their bandwagon.
For those who haven't been following the news, first a chain of profitable craft stores, and now a whole slew of other organizations, are claiming that they shouldn't have to pay for some of the health-care requirements of the Affordable Care Act  (aka "Obamacare") because it interferes with their religious freedom.
I know the religious freedom card is one with powerful sentiment, particularly among the kind of white middle-class Christians who have never had to suffer the tiniest bit of actual persecution in their lives, but please do think through the implications.
This is a private company -- not a religious institution, not a non-profit, not any kind of specialized organization, but a plan ordinary company trying to make money -- that wants to enshrine in law a right to avoid following a particular piece of law. And the basis of that right to skip out on a law would be their own interpretation of the personal religious beliefs of the owners. Logically, there's no reason why the same argument couldn't be extended to any company -- or any individual, since a company is a legal person just as a natural person is -- and any law.
In other words, Hobby Lobby is trying to make it impossible for any laws to be enforced at all if anyone can think up a pseudo-religious explanation for wanting not to follow that law. This is literally a prescription for anarchy.
Look, think of even this mild extension of the doctrine: what about a company run by Christian Scientists? They don't believe in modern medicine at all, so does that mean that company should be free to avoid paying any health-care coverage?
This is just a stupid legal argument. Admit it, give it up, and move on. Your side has comprehensively lost the battle against contraception, and the tide is just not going to shift back the way you want it.
 Specifically, the requirement that employers cover FDA-approved contraception for female employees, which Hobby Lobby and its lik say they consider abortion. This is actually one of the core issues: this case is based on what they consider a procedure to be, not what the general understanding or the actual scientific facts of that procedure are. In other words, they're demanding that their faith be given preferential legal treatment, because it is their belief.
(inspired by this Chuck Asay cartoon, which I couldn't manage to make work for Editorial Explanations, since it's not even wrong)
- Read in January
- The Rare Obligatory Political Post
- Trend Pieces
- Catty Deaths
- The Signal and the Noise by Nate Silver
- If You Like Maps of Fantasy Worlds
- In the Spirit of the Season
- The Lack of Context Should Protect Me
- Reviewing the Mail: Week of 1/26
- Two Songs About Bad Love
- Lucinda Williams 60 år
- The Journey of One Little Ring and Its Fingers
- Here's How You Know You're Not Blogging Enough
- Trött på vinter och kyla
- Reviewing the Mail: Week of 1/19
- This Is Not a Value Judgement
- Samtal öppnar nya vidder
- Skåpmålarmusik del 5: Fanny Holm
- Skåpmålarmusik del 4: Ronnie Lane's Slim Chance
- No Context! Not Safe For Work!
- Skåpmålarmusik del 3: Marti Jones
- Book Blogger Poll
- Skåpmålarmusik del 2: Dave Stewart
- Reviewing the Mail: Week of 1/12
- Skåpmålarmusik del 1: Allison Moorer
- Quick Comics Round-Up: Lemire, Dahl, Petty & Flori...
- Single Panels from Wheeler and Gross
- Orosmoln igen
- In Which I Pretend I Know What I'm Talking About
- Behavior I Don't Want to Encourage
- Van Vogt Award Winner Shocker!
- 2012 Philip K. Dick Award Nominees
- Reviewing the Mail: week of 1/5/13
- Start Your Hugo Nominations Now!
- In Which I Demand More Windows
- What BookScan Measures, and What It Doesn't
- De små sakerna
- 2012 Van Vogt Award Nominees
- Drömmar om berömmelse...?
- This Was the Year in Hornswoggling: 2012
- Favorite Books of 2012
- ▼ January (43)
- ► 2012 (395)
- ► 2011 (104)
- ► 2010 (103)
Thing the First: Holidays I hope you all had a happy Bloomsday, and are looking forward to a particularly festive Juneteenth. For myself, th...
Or, A brief jeremiad aimed at people who agree with Hobby Lobby and the various other companies jumping on their bandwagon. For those who ha...
If you read The New Yorker , you're familiar with Frazier -- he's been writing short comic pieces (collected in books like Coyote V....
Tillknycklad av kärlek, fas 2 I förra inlägget skrev jag om chocken när kärlek plötsligt tagit slut. Sen kommer de bittra anklagelserna och ...
En hel vecka har gått utan att jag hunnit med ett ord... Det är mycket nu... Desto viktigare att den musik man lyssnar på, om man nu alls hi...
I'm going to rent myself a house In the shade of the freeway I'm going to pack my lunch in the morning And go to work each day And w...
I need to update information on a website I control with information about a company in India -- and I was just on their contact page a few ...
I read all of these books in mid-February, expecting to dive back into regularly reviewing my review copies -- if any publicists are lurking...
Just nu hinner jag knappt med livets vardagliga nödvändigheter, men snart kommer oktober och då lättar det. Och det kommer en massa spännand...
Hey, remember last week, when I had no mail to write about? Well, this week makes up for it in spades, with nearly two dozen books (most of ...